rcm glossary

Improper payment review

Improper payment review is the process of examining healthcare claims and payments to identify and rectify any errors, fraud, or abuse in billing and reimbursement.

Accelerate your revenue cycle

Boost patient experience and your bottom line by automating patient cost estimates, payer underpayment detection, and contract optimization in one place.

Get a Demo

What is Improper Payment Review?

Improper payment review is a crucial component of healthcare revenue cycle management (RCM) that involves the examination and analysis of healthcare claims to identify and rectify any errors or inaccuracies that may have resulted in improper payments. It is a systematic process that aims to ensure compliance with regulatory guidelines, reduce financial losses, and enhance the overall efficiency of the revenue cycle.

Importance of Improper Payment Review

The improper payment review plays a vital role in healthcare organizations as it helps in:

1. Identifying Billing Errors: By conducting a thorough review of healthcare claims, organizations can identify billing errors such as duplicate charges, incorrect coding, or services not supported by medical documentation.

These errors can lead to overpayments or underpayments, impacting the financial health of the organization.

2. Ensuring Compliance: Healthcare organizations must comply with various regulations and guidelines set forth by government agencies such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Improper payment review helps in identifying any non-compliance issues, ensuring adherence to these regulations, and avoiding penalties or legal consequences.

3. Reducing Financial Losses: By identifying and rectifying improper payments, healthcare organizations can minimize financial losses. This includes recovering overpayments made to providers or identifying underpayments that need to be addressed to ensure fair reimbursement.

4. Enhancing Revenue Cycle Efficiency: An effective improper payment review process can streamline the revenue cycle by identifying areas of improvement. By addressing billing errors and compliance issues, organizations can optimize their revenue cycle management processes, leading to improved cash flow and financial stability.

Difference between Improper Payment Review and Claims Auditing

While improper payment review and claims auditing are related terms, they have distinct differences in their scope and purpose.

Improper Payment Review: Improper payment review focuses on identifying and rectifying errors or inaccuracies in healthcare claims that may have resulted in improper payments. It involves a comprehensive analysis of claims to ensure compliance with regulatory guidelines and to minimize financial losses. The primary goal of improper payment review is to improve the accuracy and integrity of the revenue cycle.

Claims Auditing: Claims auditing, on the other hand, is a broader term that encompasses a more extensive evaluation of healthcare claims. It involves a systematic examination of claims to assess their accuracy, completeness, and compliance with coding and billing guidelines. Claims auditing may include reviewing documentation, verifying medical necessity, and assessing the appropriateness of services provided. The purpose of claims auditing is to ensure proper reimbursement, identify potential fraud or abuse, and improve overall claims management processes.

In summary, improper payment review is a subset of claims auditing that specifically focuses on identifying and rectifying errors leading to improper payments.

Examples of Improper Payment Review

To better understand the concept of improper payment review, let's consider a few examples:

1. Duplicate Billing: A healthcare provider accidentally submits multiple claims for the same service or procedure, resulting in duplicate billing. Through improper payment review, the organization can identify these duplicate claims and take appropriate action to rectify the error, such as refunding the excess payment to the payer.

2. Upcoding or Downcoding: Upcoding refers to the practice of assigning a higher-level billing code than what is justified by the services provided. Downcoding, on the other hand, involves assigning a lower-level code that may not accurately reflect the complexity of the services rendered. Improper payment review helps in identifying such coding errors and ensures that the claims are accurately coded, leading to appropriate reimbursement.

3. Lack of Medical Necessity: Healthcare claims must demonstrate medical necessity, meaning that the services provided were reasonable and necessary for the patient's condition. Improper payment review helps in identifying claims where medical necessity documentation is insufficient or lacking, allowing organizations to take corrective measures and avoid potential payment denials or recoupments.

4. Non-Compliance with Documentation Requirements: Government payers, such as Medicare, have specific documentation requirements that must be met for reimbursement. Improper payment review helps in identifying claims where the required documentation is missing or incomplete, enabling organizations to rectify the issue and ensure compliance with payer guidelines.

By conducting a comprehensive improper payment review, healthcare organizations can identify and rectify these and other types of errors, leading to improved revenue cycle management and financial outcomes.

In conclusion, improper payment review is a critical process within healthcare revenue cycle management that aims to identify and rectify errors or inaccuracies in healthcare claims. It plays a vital role in ensuring compliance, reducing financial losses, and enhancing the overall efficiency of the revenue cycle. By conducting a thorough review of claims, healthcare organizations can identify billing errors, ensure compliance with regulations, minimize financial losses, and optimize their revenue cycle management processes.

Improve your financial performance while providing a more transparent patient experience

Full Page Background