rcm metrics

Average Days in Dispute

Accelerate your revenue cycle

Boost patient experience and your bottom line by automating patient cost estimates, payer underpayment detection, and contract optimization in one place.

Get a Demo

What is Average Days in Dispute

Average Days in Dispute is a key metric in healthcare revenue cycle management that measures the average number of days it takes to resolve a disputed claim. Disputed claims occur when there is a disagreement between the healthcare provider and the payer regarding the amount of reimbursement owed for a particular service or treatment. The Average Days in Dispute metric is calculated by dividing the total number of days it takes to resolve all disputed claims by the total number of disputed claims. This metric is important because it provides insight into the efficiency of the revenue cycle management process. A high number of days in dispute can indicate that there are issues with the billing process or that there is a lack of communication between the provider and payer. By tracking Average Days in Dispute, healthcare organizations can identify areas for improvement in their revenue cycle management process and work to reduce the time it takes to resolve disputed claims. This can lead to faster reimbursement and improved cash flow, which is critical for the financial health of healthcare organizations.

How to calculate Average Days in Dispute

Average Days in Dispute is calculated by dividing the total number of days that a claim is in dispute by the total number of claims that are in dispute. To calculate this metric, first identify all claims that are currently in dispute. Then, for each claim, determine the number of days that the claim has been in dispute. Add up the total number of days for all claims in dispute. Finally, divide the total number of days by the total number of claims in dispute to arrive at the Average Days in Dispute.

This metric can be used to track the efficiency of the dispute resolution process and identify areas for improvement.

Best practices to improve Average Days in Dispute

Best practices to improve Average Days in Dispute are:

1. Implement a robust denial management process: A denial management process helps identify the root cause of denials and provides insights into the areas that require improvement. By addressing the root cause of denials, healthcare organizations can reduce the number of disputes and improve the average days in dispute.

2. Streamline the appeals process: A streamlined appeals process can help reduce the time taken to resolve disputes. Healthcare organizations should have a clear appeals process in place, with defined timelines and escalation procedures.

3. Improve communication with payers: Effective communication with payers can help resolve disputes quickly. Healthcare organizations should have a dedicated team to handle payer communication and ensure that all necessary information is provided to the payer in a timely manner.

4. Leverage technology: Technology can help automate the dispute resolution process and reduce the time taken to resolve disputes. Healthcare organizations should invest in a robust RCM system that can automate the dispute resolution process and provide real-time insights into the status of disputes.

5. Monitor and analyze dispute data: Healthcare organizations should monitor and analyze dispute data to identify trends and patterns. This can help identify areas that require improvement and enable healthcare organizations to take proactive measures to reduce disputes and improve the average days in dispute.By implementing these best practices, healthcare organizations can improve their revenue cycle management and reduce the average days in dispute, resulting in improved cash flow and financial stability.

Average Days in Dispute Benchmark

The industry standard benchmark for Average Days in Dispute is 30 days or less. This means that healthcare organizations should aim to resolve disputed claims within 30 days or less to meet the industry standard. However, it is important to note that this benchmark may vary depending on the size and complexity of the organization, as well as the type of claims being disputed.

By monitoring and improving their Average Days in Dispute metric, healthcare organizations can reduce their accounts receivable days and improve their cash flow. This can be achieved by implementing efficient processes for claim submission, denial management, and appeals, as well as investing in technology and staff training to improve the accuracy and timeliness of claims processing.

How MD Clarity can help you optimize Average Days in Dispute

Revenue cycle software can significantly improve the Average Days in Dispute metric by streamlining the entire revenue cycle process. With the help of advanced analytics and automation tools, revenue cycle software can identify the root cause of disputes and provide actionable insights to resolve them quickly.

By automating the billing and coding process, revenue cycle software can reduce errors and minimize the chances of disputes arising in the first place. Additionally, it can help healthcare providers track the status of claims and identify any potential issues before they escalate into disputes.

Moreover, revenue cycle software can provide real-time visibility into the entire revenue cycle process, allowing healthcare providers to identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies that may be contributing to longer dispute resolution times. This insight can help providers make data-driven decisions to optimize their revenue cycle process and improve the Average Days in Dispute metric.If you're looking to improve your healthcare organization's revenue cycle management and reduce the Average Days in Dispute metric, consider booking a demo with MD Clarity's revenue cycle software. Our software is designed to streamline the entire revenue cycle process, from patient registration to claim submission and payment posting, helping you improve your financial performance and patient satisfaction. Contact us today to learn more!

Improve your financial performance while providing a more transparent patient experience

Full Page Background