DENIAL CODES

Denial code N394

Remark code N394 is an alert indicating the submission of incomplete or invalid progress notes or reports in billing.

Accelerate your revenue cycle

Boost patient experience and your bottom line by automating patient cost estimates, payer underpayment detection, and contract optimization in one place.

Get a Demo

What is Denial Code N394

Remark code N394 is an indication that the submitted claim contains incomplete or invalid progress notes or reports, which are necessary for the processing and adjudication of the claim.

Common Causes of RARC N394

Common causes of code N394 (Incomplete/invalid progress notes/report) are:

1. Missing documentation: Essential parts of the progress notes or reports are not included in the patient's medical record.

2. Illegible handwriting: The healthcare provider's handwriting is difficult to read, leading to uncertainties about the patient's condition or treatment.

3. Lack of detail: The progress notes or reports are too vague, lacking specific information about the patient's diagnosis, treatment plan, or response to treatment.

4. Non-compliance with documentation standards: The documentation does not meet the specific standards or formats required by the payer.

5. Omission of dates or signatures: The progress notes or reports are missing dates of service or healthcare provider signatures, which are necessary for verification.

6. Use of unauthorized abbreviations or symbols: The documentation includes abbreviations or symbols that are not recognized or approved by the payer.

7. Failure to update patient records: The progress notes or reports do not reflect the most current information about the patient's condition or treatment.

8. Incorrect patient information: The documentation contains errors in patient identification details, such as name, date of birth, or patient ID number.

Ways to Mitigate Denial Code N394

Ways to mitigate code N394 include implementing a comprehensive checklist for all healthcare providers to follow when documenting patient visits. This checklist should highlight the essential components of progress notes, such as subjective and objective findings, assessment and plan, and specific patient instructions or recommendations. Additionally, adopting an electronic health record (EHR) system with built-in prompts and templates can guide providers in completing thorough and compliant documentation. Regular training sessions on documentation best practices and periodic audits of progress notes can also help identify common errors and areas for improvement, ensuring that all necessary information is accurately and completely recorded.

How to Address Denial Code N394

The steps to address code N394 involve a multi-faceted approach to ensure the completeness and validity of progress notes or reports. Initially, it's crucial to conduct a thorough review of the documentation in question to identify the specific elements that are missing or deemed invalid. This may require collaboration with the healthcare provider or the medical records department to pinpoint the deficiencies.

Following the identification of the missing or invalid components, the next step is to rectify these issues. This could involve the healthcare provider amending the progress notes to include the necessary clinical details, diagnostic information, treatment provided, and the patient's response to the treatment. It's important that the documentation is comprehensive and accurately reflects the patient's encounter.

Once the documentation has been updated and verified for completeness and accuracy, resubmit the claim with the revised progress notes or report attached. Ensure that the resubmission is marked clearly to indicate that it is addressing a previous denial or request for information, to expedite the review process.

Additionally, it may be beneficial to implement a quality assurance process within the healthcare practice to prevent similar issues from occurring in the future. This could involve training for healthcare providers on the requirements for progress notes and reports, regular audits of documentation, and feedback loops to continuously improve the documentation process.

Lastly, maintain open lines of communication with the payer to understand any specific documentation requirements they may have and to receive feedback on submitted documentation. This proactive approach can help in reducing the occurrence of code N394 and improving the overall efficiency of the revenue cycle management process.

CARCs Associated to RARC N394

Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle

Full Page Background