DENIAL CODES

Denial code N766

Remark code N766 is an explanation that the payer does not cover co-payments assessed by another insurer.

Accelerate your revenue cycle

Boost patient experience and your bottom line by automating patient cost estimates, payer underpayment detection, and contract optimization in one place.

Get a Demo

What is Denial Code N766

Remark code N766 is an indication that the current payer does not provide coverage for the co-payment amount that was previously assessed by another payer.

Common Causes of RARC N766

Common causes of code N766 are:

1. The submission of a claim to a secondary or tertiary payer without proper adjustment or notation of the primary payer's co-payment responsibility.

2. Incorrectly coded services that the secondary or tertiary payer does not recognize as co-payment eligible.

3. Failure to provide adequate documentation or explanation of benefits (EOB) from the primary payer, leading the subsequent payer to reject the co-payment charge.

4. Misinterpretation of the primary payer's policies or coverage limitations, resulting in an unexpected co-payment requirement not covered by subsequent payers.

5. Administrative errors, such as incorrect patient identification or insurance policy numbers, leading to a mismatch in coverage assessment.

6. The use of outdated or incorrect billing codes that do not accurately reflect the primary payer's co-payment policies.

Ways to Mitigate Denial Code N766

Ways to mitigate code N766 include implementing a comprehensive verification process for patient insurance coverage before services are rendered. This involves confirming not only the patient's eligibility but also the specifics of what their plan covers, including co-payment responsibilities and how they are handled when multiple payers are involved. Training staff to understand the nuances of different insurance policies and maintaining updated records of payer agreements can also help. Additionally, adopting a proactive communication strategy with patients about their financial responsibilities, including potential co-payments from secondary payers, can prevent misunderstandings and ensure that all parties are informed about possible charges from the outset. Utilizing technology to automate insurance verification and eligibility checks can streamline this process, making it more efficient and reducing the likelihood of encountering code N766.

How to Address Denial Code N766

The steps to address code N766 involve a multi-faceted approach to ensure proper handling and resolution. Initially, it's crucial to verify the accuracy of the co-payment assessment by reviewing the patient's coverage details and the Explanation of Benefits (EOB) from the previous payer. If the co-payment was correctly assessed, the next step is to communicate directly with the patient regarding their responsibility for this charge, providing a clear breakdown of the costs incurred and the reason for the co-payment.

In parallel, it's advisable to conduct an internal audit of the billing process to ensure that the claim was submitted correctly and that all necessary documentation was provided to support the co-payment charge. This includes verifying that the correct codes were used and that the services rendered are accurately reflected.

If discrepancies are found during the audit, or if there is a possibility that the co-payment may not have been accurately assessed, consider resubmitting the claim with the corrected information or additional documentation to support the co-payment charge. This may involve coordination with the previous payer to clarify coverage details or to obtain additional information that could support the claim.

Throughout this process, maintain detailed records of all communications and documentation related to the code N766 issue. This includes notes from conversations with the patient, correspondence with payers, and any internal audit findings. These records will be invaluable if there is a need to appeal the decision or to provide further clarification to the patient or other stakeholders.

Finally, use this experience as an opportunity to review and possibly update internal billing and communication processes to prevent similar issues in the future. This could involve additional training for staff on navigating payer policies or enhancing patient communication strategies to ensure clarity and transparency regarding billing and co-payment responsibilities.

CARCs Associated to RARC N766

Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle

Full Page Background