Remark code N850 indicates a claim was denied due to missing, incomplete, or invalid narrative for the described service/treatment.
Remark code N850 indicates that there is a missing, incomplete, or invalid narrative explanation or description of the service or treatment provided. This means that the documentation submitted does not adequately detail the nature of the service or treatment, which is necessary for processing the claim.
Common causes of code N850 are incomplete documentation regarding the specifics of the service or treatment provided, failure to include a detailed narrative or explanation of the necessity and process of the service or treatment, and submission of claims with generic or vague descriptions that do not satisfy payer requirements for detailed clinical justification. Additionally, this code may be triggered by the absence of supportive documentation that clearly outlines the patient's condition and the rationale behind the chosen treatment approach.
Ways to mitigate code N850 include ensuring that all documentation for services or treatments is thoroughly reviewed before submission. This involves double-checking that narratives are not only present but also complete and accurately describe the service or treatment provided. Implementing a checklist for documentation requirements can help identify any missing elements before claims are processed. Additionally, training staff on the importance of detailed and clear narratives and providing examples of acceptable descriptions can improve the quality of submissions. Regular audits of submitted claims can also identify common errors or omissions, allowing for corrective action to be taken to prevent future occurrences of this code.
The steps to address code N850 involve a multi-faceted approach to ensure that the narrative for the service or treatment is accurately completed and effectively communicated. Initially, review the patient's medical records and documentation related to the service or treatment in question. This review should focus on identifying any missing information or clarifying any incomplete or ambiguous details.
Next, collaborate with the healthcare provider who performed the service or treatment to gather additional details or clarification needed to complete the narrative. This may involve discussing the specific aspects of the patient's condition, the rationale behind choosing the particular service or treatment, and any other relevant details that justify the necessity and appropriateness of the service.
Once the necessary information is collected, revise the narrative to include all pertinent details in a clear and concise manner. Ensure that the narrative explicitly describes the service or treatment, including how it was performed, the reason it was chosen for the patient's specific condition, and any outcomes or follow-up care that was recommended.
After revising the narrative, resubmit the claim with the updated documentation. Ensure that the narrative is attached to the claim in the correct format as required by the payer. It may also be beneficial to include a cover letter or note highlighting the addition or correction of the narrative to draw the payer's attention to the updated information.
Finally, monitor the claim's status after resubmission to ensure that it is processed successfully. If the claim is denied again for the same or a different reason, evaluate the feedback provided and determine if further action is needed. This may involve additional clarification, further documentation, or possibly an appeal if the claim is believed to be unjustly denied. Throughout this process, maintain clear and open communication with all parties involved, including the healthcare provider, the billing team, and the payer, to facilitate a smooth resolution.
Get paid in full by bringing clarity to your revenue cycle
Subscribe to the
Healthcare Clarified newsletter
Get the latest insights on RCM and healthcare policy in your inbox
